Skip to main content
· 12/3/1984

Ondish v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 598 F. Supp. 768
  • 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,306
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When an equal protection claim is premised on unique treatment rather than 21 a classification, the Supreme Court has described it as a ‘class of one’ claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caffrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.