· 2/2/1981
Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of NJ
Citations
- 425 A.2d 1057
- 85 N.J. 171
- 1981 N.J. LEXIS 2589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff’s TRA claim could not be sustained for his failure to prove damages
- holding that the cardinal rule of interpretation is to give effect to “the intention of the parties to the contract as revealed by the language used, taken as an entirety”
- holding plaintiff's claim under N.J.S.A. 2A:42- 10.10 could not be sustained for his failure to prove damages
- stating that the cardinal rule in contract interpretation is to give effect to “the intention of the parties to the contract as revealed by the language used”
- imposing a contractual obligation on management of a retirement community to provide financial disclosure statements to its residents
- “Every contract or duty within this Act imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schreiber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.