Skip to main content
· 2/2/1981

Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of NJ

Citations

  • 425 A.2d 1057
  • 85 N.J. 171
  • 1981 N.J. LEXIS 2589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s TRA claim could not be sustained for his failure to prove damages
  • holding that the cardinal rule of interpretation is to give effect to “the intention of the parties to the contract as revealed by the language used, taken as an entirety”
  • holding plaintiff's claim under N.J.S.A. 2A:42- 10.10 could not be sustained for his failure to prove damages
  • stating that the cardinal rule in contract interpretation is to give effect to “the intention of the parties to the contract as revealed by the language used”
  • imposing a contractual obligation on management of a retirement community to provide financial disclosure statements to its residents
  • “Every contract or duty within this Act imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schreiber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.