On-Line Technologies, Inc. v. Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer Gmbh, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Perkin-Elmer Inc., Sick Upa Gmbh, and Sick, A.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a claim interpretation that excludes a preferred embodiment from the scope of the claim is rarely, if ever, correct” (internal quotations and citations omitted)
• “After a patent has issued, the information contained within it is ordinarily regarded as public and not subject to protection as a trade secret.”
• “After a patent has issued, the information contained within it is ordinarily regarded as public and not subject to protection as a trade secret.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).