Omo Mfg. Co. v. Mystic Rubber. Co.

Citations

• 225 F. 92
• 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1260

Syllabus

<p>Tbade-Maeks and Tbade-Names <©=^58—Ineeingement—Similabity in Appeakance.</p> <p>The trade-mark “oMo” for a dress shield held, infringed by the mark “oMhs” used in the same place on the same class of goods; the distinctive feature of both being a large central M flanked by smaller letters, and defendant’s mark as a whole having such a close resemblance to complainant’s as to be likely to deceive purchasers.</p> <p>[Ed. .Note.—For other cases, see Trade-Marks and Trade-Names, Cent. Dig. §§ 66, 67; Dec. Dig. <S=>58.]</p> <p><§=^For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p>