Skip to main content
· 12/30/1993

Omnitrus Merging Corp. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

Citations

  • 628 N.E.2d 1165
  • 256 Ill. App. 3d 31
  • 195 Ill. Dec. 701
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 2096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • courts must determine the intention of the parties from the plain language of a clear and unambiguous contract
  • courts must determine the intention of the parties from the plain language of a clear and unambiguous contract
  • exclusive remedy provisions are recognized by our courts and enforced
  • “If a contract is clear and unambiguous, the judge must determine the intention of the parties ‘solely from the plain language of the contract’ and may not consider extrinsic evidence outside the ‘four corners’ of the document itself.”
  • exclusive remedy provisions are recognized by our courts and enforced
  • “The primary objective in contract construction is to give effect to the intention of the parties ***. If the contract is clear and unambiguous, the judge must determine the intention of the parties solely from the plain language of the contract ***.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.