Skip to main content
· 2/23/2001

Omnipoint Communication, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

Citations

  • 767 A.2d 488
  • 337 N.J. Super. 398
  • 2001 N.J. Super. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing Board's ability to accept or reject any expert testimony presented
  • discussing the purpose of the use variance with regard to wireless facilities
  • A by itself, the mere denial of plaintiff= s single application did not indicate that the ordinance violates the statute@
  • A by itself, the mere denial of plaintiff= s single application did not indicate that the ordinance violates the statute@

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Baime and Wallace, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.