Omni Berkshire Corp. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the fact that the parties did not specifically use language that deviated from the industry standard “suggests that the parties intended to require only what the industry generally accepted.”
• holding agreement ambiguous because it leaves key terms undefined
• holding agreement ambiguous because it leaves key terms undefined
• “No inactivity fees. E*TRADE Securities will not charge fees when your account is inactive for a period of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).