Skip to main content
· 3/10/1987

Omega Homes, Inc. v. Citicorp Acceptance Co.

Citations

  • 656 F. Supp. 393
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The court refuses to endorse Omega’s tactic of inducing broad disclosure under a set of ground rules and of then avoiding any limitations on itself by asking the court to come in and change those rules.”
  • the terms of the protective order should be enforced when a protective order was stipulated to by the parties and it is clear that discovery was for the purpose of one case and not for other cases
  • “When, however, the proposed modification affects a protective order stipulated to by the parties ... it is clear that the shared and explicit assumption that discovery was for the purposes of one case alone goes a long way toward denying the movant’s request without more.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.