Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Omega, S.A., Docket No. 04-5084-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agreement to settle litigation is a \contract that is interpreted according to general principles of contract law\
• stating that New York and Connecticut law are the same regarding enforcement of settlement agreements
• noting that “a party’s subsequent change of heart will not unmake a bargain already made.” (citations omitted)
• recognizing a “settlement agreement is a contract that is interpreted according to [the] general principles of contract law”
• finding that magistrate judge who oversaw settlement conference did not abuse his discretion in declining to recuse himself from deciding motion to enforce settlement
• applying objective test to recusal motion brought under 455(b)(1), and denying recusal because movant could not demonstrate that the judge’s “impartiality could reasonably be questioned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).