Omega Consulting v. FARRINGTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Federal law, however, is clear that a company may not appear pro se but rather must be represented by counsel.”
• “Federal law . . . is clear that a company may not appear pro se but rather must be represented by counsel.”
• “Federal law . . . is clear that a company may not appear pro se but rather must be represented by counsel.”
• “Federal law . . . is clear that a company may not appear pro se but rather must be represented by counsel.”
• “While some courts have allowed sole proprietorships to proceed pro se . . . this Court disagrees. If a party wishes to take advantage of the benefits of the corporate form, he or she must also assume its concomitant burdens.”
• not permitting sole proprietorship to proceed pro se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).