Omasta v. Choices Benefit Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the presence of conflicting evidence on the disability issue is a factor that the court considers in making its determination of whether the administrator’s decision to deny benefits was arbitrary and capricious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).