· 6/12/1984
Omark Industries v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America
Citations
- 590 F. Supp. 114
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disputing notion that “underlying claims must be covered under workers’ compensation in order to fall within an employee exclusion clause”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.