Skip to main content
· 9/26/2006

O'MALLEY v. Town of Egremont

Citations

  • 453 F. Supp. 2d 240
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70053
  • 2006 WL 2773869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Rule 6(b) “does not apply to time periods set out in statutes’’
  • holding that the court “may not utilize Rule 6(b) to extend the statute of limitations” (first quoting Parker v. Marcotte, 975 F. Supp. 1266, 1269 (C.D. Cal. 1997), rev’d on other grounds, 198 F.3d 254 (9th Cir. 1999
  • “It is well established that “Rule 6(b) governs the enlargement of time periods prescribed by the federal rules or by an order of the district court[,]” but the rule “does not apply to time periods set out in statutes.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor, Neiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.