O'Malley v. O'Malley
Citations
- 78 Pa. Super. 10
- 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 330
Syllabus
<p>Real property — Rstate by entireties — Divorce — Accounting for rents.</p> <p>1. Tenants by the entireties are not seized o£ undivided halves of the estate. Both are seized of the whole. There can be no severance of ownership in such an estate except by death of one of the parties, or by voluntary alienation by both. A divorce does not change an estate by the entireties into a tenancy in common.</p> <p>2. A divorced wife cannot compel her former husband to account for and pay over to her one-half of the net revenues received by him from property held by them as tenants by the entireties.</p>
Judges: Anv, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Out, Porter, Trexler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-05-22· cited 129×
- Stuckey v. Keefe's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1856-07-01· cited 53×
- Alles v. LyonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-01-07· cited 45×
- McCurdy & Stevenson v. CanningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1870-01-10· cited 38×
- Meyer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-05-23· cited 30×
- Hetzel v. LincolnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-06-27· cited 18×
- Fairchild v. ChastelleuxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1845-07-15· cited 16×
- French v. MehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1867-11-18· cited 5×
- Hilt v. HiltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-07-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.