O'MALLEY v. Mounts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the language of the grand theft statute does not suggest that the legislature intended grand theft to be a continuing offense
• holding that, for statute of limitations purposes, a crime of theft occurred when defendant exceeded his authority as to funds entrusted to him, not when he first received the funds
• concluding that the statute of limitations for grand theft is five years
• noting language of current Section 812.014 is the same as the pre-amended version

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).