Omaha Standard Body Co. v. Fuchs Equipment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the district court did not conduct a proper San-din analysis when it failed to consider the 288-day duration of the inmate’s disciplinary confinement
• noting that the district court did not conduct a proper Sandin analysis when it failed to consider the 288-day duration of the inmate's disciplinary confinement
• vacating and remanding grant of summary judgment where district court failed to consider length and conditions of segregated confinement
• vacating district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant on ground that the court improperly resolved the conflict between sides by crediting defendant’s testimony
• to defeat a properly supported motion for summary judgment, “the nonmovant must produce specific facts indicating that a genuine factual issue exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).