Skip to main content
· 2/12/1980

Omaha Public Power District v. Darin & Armstrong, Inc.

Citations

  • 288 N.W.2d 467
  • 205 Neb. 484
  • 1980 Neb. LEXIS 739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is a basic concept that in any damage action for breach of contract the claimant must prove that the breach of contract complained of was the proximate cause of the alleged damages.\
  • \It is a basic concept that in any damage action for breach of contract the claimant must prove that the breach of contract complained of was the proximate cause of the alleged damages.\
  • \It is a basic concept that in any damage action for breach of contract the claimant must prove that the breach of contract complained of was the proximate cause of the alleged damages.\
  • \It is a basic concept that in any damage action for breach of contract the claimant must prove that the breach of contract complained of was the proximate cause of the alleged damages.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, McCown, Clinton, Brodkey, White, Hastings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.