Olympic Waste Services v. City of Grand Saline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consultations about the “legal ramifications” of terminating a contract were appropriate but discussing the “resulting contractual options” exceeded the scope of the authorization
• holding that while discussion of merits of proposed contract in executive session with legal counsel violated TOMA, open-session vote to award contract did not violate TOMA and contract was not voidable
• holding closed session that violated Act did not render contract voidable when vote awarding contract occurred in open session after violation occurred
• holding closed session that violated Act did not render contract voidable when vote awarding contract occurred in open session after violation occurred
• holding closed session that violated Act did not render contract voidable when vote awarding contract occurred in open session after violation occurred
• holding closed session that violated Act did not render contract voidable when vote awarding contract occurred in open session after violation occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).