Olympic Chartering SA v. MINISTRY OF IND. AND TRADE OF JORDAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “since the plaintiff in the instant case has not identified any specific assets in its motion, the Court cannot adequately review the propriety of attaching the assets of the judgment-debt- or” for purposes of satisfying § 1610(c)
• holding that “since the plaintiff in the instant case has 19 not identified any specific assets in its motion, the Court cannot adequately review the propriety of attaching the assets of the judgment-debtor” for purposes of satisfying § 1610(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).