Olson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that repeal by implication results where the subsequent statute deals with “the same subject matter” as the earlier consistent statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Anway
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-02-24· cited 60×
• Clayton v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1931-04-13· cited 52×
• State v. Hoffman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1955-02-04· cited 30×
• State v. Parish
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1957-05-02· cited 30×
• State v. Snell
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1964-06-12· cited 28×
• State v. Morf
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1956-04-03· cited 25×
• State v. Porras
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-02-28· cited 21×
• Behrens v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1941-12-12· cited 21×
• Northeast Rapid Transit Co. v. City of Phoenix
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1932-11-16· cited 20×
• State v. Rodgers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-10-16· cited 18×
• Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 17×
• Mahoney v. County of Maricopa
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1937-05-22· cited 17×
• United States v. Eagleson
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1954-02-05· cited 14×
• State Board of Health v. Frohmiller
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1933-07-14· cited 13×
• State v. Tsinnijinnie
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-12-11· cited 7×
• State v. Lee
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1939-04-03· cited 5×
• Kitchel v. Gadsden Hotel Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1933-07-12· cited 2×
• Pitcher v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1932-10-18· cited 1×