D. Minnesota· 10/19/1998
Olson v. Snap Products, Inc.
Citations
- 29 F. Supp. 2d 1027
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19840
- 1998 WL 870231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A plaintiff need not demonstrate an entitlement to punitive damages per se, but only an entitlement to allege such damages.”
- “[T]he mere existence of negligence or of gross negligence does not rise to the level of willful indifference so as to warrant a claim for punitive damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Berczyk v. Emerson Tool Co.D. Minnesota· 2003-09-16· cited 29×
- Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2011-09-27· cited 23×
- Schedin v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2012-11-30· cited 22×
- Hern v. Bankers Life Casualty Co.D. Minnesota· 2001-01-12· cited 12×
- Freeland v. FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.D. Minnesota· 2011-06-08· cited 5×
- Jones v. KrautheimD. Colorado· 2002-06-25· cited 5×
- Fabio v. Credit Bureau of Hutchinson, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2002-09-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.