Olson v. Peterson
Citations
- 88 Kan. 350
- 128 P. 191
- 1912 Kan. LEXIS 67
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Deed—In Wife’s Name—When Not Fraudulent. If the husband is not in debt and there is no intention to defraud subsequent creditors, a purchase of real estate in the wife’s name upon a consideration paid by the husband is valid.</p> <p>2. - Intent to Defraud—Moral Obligation of Grantee to Reeonvey. Where the owner of real estate with intent to defraud his creditors has conveyed his property to another without consideration, and subsequently settles with his creditors, the grantee is under a high moral obligation to reeonvey the property, but can not be compelled to do so. The moral obligation to reconvey is a valuable and sufficient consideration for a deed by which the title is reconveyed to the original grantor, or at his direction or with his consent is conveyed to him and his wife.</p> <p>3. -Fraudulent Conveyance — Reconveyance to Husband and Wife—Presumptions. In such a case where the lands conveyed consist of a farm occupied for many years by the grantor and his wife as their home and presumably acquired by their joint efforts, and after the settlement with his creditors the grantee in the fraudulent deed conveys the lands to him and his wife without any valuable consideration being paid by the wife, there is no presumption that she was to hold the title conveyed to her in trust for the husband; and prima fade the deed vests in her the absolute title to an undivided half interest in the lands.</p> <p>4. - Same. Whether the intent of the parties to such a transaction was to convey to the wife an absolute interest or merely to restore to the grantees the same title and interest which they had transferred by the former conveyance is a question for the jury to determine, where there are circumstances from which an inference of intent either way may be drawn.</p> <p>5. Subrogation—Mortgage—Rights of Payor. Lands belonged to a husband and wife and were encumbered by a mortgage executed by them. After the death of the wife the husban
Judges: Porter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clester v. ClesterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-04-12· cited 31×
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-03-04· cited 28×
- New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-01-09· cited 25×
- Blitz ex rel. Erickson v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1925-12-05· cited 24×
- Farmers Insurance v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-04-05· cited 22×
- Rosenberg v. BaumTenth Circuit· 1946-01-08· cited 20×
- Davidson v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-01-11· cited 15×
- Manhattan State Bank v. HaidSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-02-12· cited 14×
- Katschor v. LeySupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-05-10· cited 14×
- Spradling v. HawkSupreme Court of Kansas· 1931-07-03· cited 12×
- Kirkpatrick v. AultSupreme Court of Kansas· 1955-03-05· cited 11×
- Wyatt v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-05-10· cited 11×
- Pricer v. SimontonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1931-12-12· cited 9×
- University State Bank v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-01-19· cited 8×
- Breyfogle v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-04-07· cited 6×
- Waddle v. BirdSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-06-09· cited 5×
- Page v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-04-11· cited 4×
- Farmers State Bank v. SchuetteSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-03-10· cited 2×
- Crane v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-05-08· cited 2×
- Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blodgett v. HittWisconsin Supreme Court· 1871-06-15· cited 40×
- Johnson v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court· 1888-12-21· cited 24×
- Carter v. BeckerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-06-11· cited 10×
- Weimer v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court· 1880-01-23· cited 10×
- Adoue v. SpencerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1901-03-28· cited 10×
- Executors of the Estate of Robinson v. Heirs of BloodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-02-08· cited 7×
- Henry W. King & Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1898-12-14· cited 5×
- Eaton v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1890-06-21· cited 4×
- Pitkin v. MottMissouri Court of Appeals· 1894-02-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.