Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/21/1995
Olson v. Olson
Citations
- 534 N.W.2d 547
- 1995 Minn. LEXIS 613
- 1995 WL 429158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “in all matters involving court-established family relationships of children, [courts] begin with reference to [their] paramount commitment to the best interests of the children”
- recognizing district court’s broad discretion to 5 decide parenting-time questions based on the best interests of child
- noting that the court cannot supply to a statute language that the Legislature omitted
- distinguishing the factual findings required for visitation cases from those required for custody determinations
- distinguishing the factual findings required for visitation cases from those required for custody determinations
- “As in all matters involving court-established family relationships of children, we begin with reference to our paramount commitment to the best interests of the children.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gardebring
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 99×
- Soohoo v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-05-10· cited 96×
- Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-02-29· cited 70×
- LaChapelle v. MittenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-03-14· cited 53×
- Braith v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-08-07· cited 34×
- Hagen v. SchirmersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-06-08· cited 29×
- In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael RupeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-10-20· cited 26×
- Marriage of Toughill v. ToughillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-05-09· cited 19×
- Marriage of Matson v. MatsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-01-29· cited 14×
- Joel v. WellmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-07-30· cited 13×
- Nolte v. MehrensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-07-30· cited 13×
- Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-05-07· cited 12×
- Marriage of Kielley v. KielleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-02-17· cited 12×
- Givens v. DarstCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-06-20· cited 10×
- Hansen v. TodnemSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-03-14· cited 9×
- Petition of SantoroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-07-16· cited 8×
- Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-03-21· cited 7×
- Custody of A.V.A. v. RatchaneewanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-07-20· cited 6×
- J.W. ex rel. D.W. v. C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-05-22· cited 6×
- In Re the Adoption of C.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-08-06· cited 5×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 3,250×
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 2,515×
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-08· cited 224×
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-01-29· cited 90×
- Roberts v. WardSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-04-18· cited 37×
- State ex rel. Flint v. FlintSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-12-13· cited 36×
- Robins Island Preservation Fund, Inc. v. Southold Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 35×
- Manthei v. MantheiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-05· cited 30×
- In Re the Welfare of D.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-06-12· cited 30×
- In Re NiskanenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-08-16· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.