Olson v. McFarland Clinic, P.C. (In Re Olson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant’s continuing refusal to provide medical treatment to the discharged debtor was an action to collect a prepetition, discharged debt, in violation of § 524(a)(2)
• conditioning future medical service upon repayment of pre-petition debt is a violation of § 524(a)(2)
• finding that a creditor who sent a letter to debtors advising them that they would not provide medical care unless they paid a pre-petition debt for medical services rendered was an act to collect a claim in violation of the automatic stay
• hospital violated section 524(a) by refusing to provide services with the intention of coercing debtor to pay discharged debt
• a creditor refusing to provide medical care to a bankrupt on a cash basis violates the automatic stay
• basing decision on §§ 362(a) and 524(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).