Olson v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting trial court’s “no reasonable basis” determination, in part because the court had made that determination after it “weighed the parties’ competing evidence”
• rejecting trial court’s “no reasonable basis” determination, in part, because the court had made the determination after it “weighed the parties’ competing evidence”
• rejecting trial court’s “no reasonable basis” determination, in part, because the court had made the determination after it “weighed the parties’ competing evidence”
• objectively reasonable basis for asserting claim “is a function of the substantive law governing the claim” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• where the court granted a motion striking portions of the pleading and the plaintiff refused to replead, a judgment dismissing the case was proper because no functioning complaint was extant
• where the court granted a motion striking portions of the pleading and the plaintiff refused to replead, a judgment dismissing the case was proper because no functioning complaint was extant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).