Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that merchants are not required to make floors more slip-resistant when they are wet
• holding that to impose a duty on merchants to continuously inspect and maintain floors to ensure their freedom from foreign substances would effectively render them insurers of customer safety
• holding that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable
• holding the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable, even after final judgment
• holding denial of motion for summary judgment is not appealable
• “We adhere to recent precedent and hold that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable, even after final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).