Olson v. Etheridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that both a promisee and an intended third party beneficiary may sue to enforce a 9 contract
• noting that a nonparty to a contract must sue under a third-party beneficiary theory
• noting that a contract entered into for the direct benefit of a third person is enforceable in Illinois
• noting that a nonparty to a contract must sue under a third-party beneficiary theory
• “[W]e hereby adopt the vesting rule set forth in section 311 of the Second Restatement [of Contracts].”
• “[W]e hereby adopt the vesting rule set forth in sec‐ tion 311 of the Second Restatement [of Contracts].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).