Skip to main content
· 10/23/2012

Olson v. Curators of the University of Missouri

Citations

  • 381 S.W.3d 406
  • 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1355
  • 2012 WL 5265505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • state district court cannot order discovery for copyright claim, as such matters fall exclusively within federal jurisdiction
  • rule 202 petitioner sought to discover identity of anonymous blogger and also anticipated filing suit asserting claims for libel and business disparagement against blogger
  • state district court cannot order discovery for copyright claim, as such matters fall exclusively within federal jurisdiction
  • “While Rule 202 is silent on the subject, we think it implicit, as it has always been, that the court must have subject-matter jurisdiction over the anticipated action.”
  • “[A] court cannot grant relief when it lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newton, Tucker, Welsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.