· 10/23/2012
Olson v. Curators of the University of Missouri
Citations
- 381 S.W.3d 406
- 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1355
- 2012 WL 5265505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state district court cannot order discovery for copyright claim, as such matters fall exclusively within federal jurisdiction
- rule 202 petitioner sought to discover identity of anonymous blogger and also anticipated filing suit asserting claims for libel and business disparagement against blogger
- state district court cannot order discovery for copyright claim, as such matters fall exclusively within federal jurisdiction
- “While Rule 202 is silent on the subject, we think it implicit, as it has always been, that the court must have subject-matter jurisdiction over the anticipated action.”
- “[A] court cannot grant relief when it lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newton, Tucker, Welsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.