Olson v. Connerly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]onsideration must be given to whether the employee was actuated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve his or her employer.”
• “To the extent [Hibma] eliminate[s] the employee’s intent as a factor, [it is] inconsistent with what we have said here and [is] thus incorrect under Wisconsin law.”
• sex between medical assistant at health-care clinic and physician on medical-school faculty who was assigned to clinic as part of faculty duties was not within the scope of his employment at the clinic
• employer not liable for sexual contact between physician and patient
• employer not liable for sexual contact between physician and patient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).