Olsen v. Draper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing several cases denying discovery- related motions filed after discovery, including some near or after summary judgment
• denying plaintiff's motion to compel 18 months after discovery had closed
• relying on Choate v. Nat’l RR Passenger Corp., 132 F. Supp. 2d 569, 574 (E.D. Mich. 2001), in which the court held that a party who had filed a motion to compel over three months after the close of discovery had waived his rights by failing to promptly enforce them
• “[C]ourts have denied tardy discovery motions that were filed after the close of discovery, especially where the moving party had all the information it needed to timely file the discovery motion, and its late filing would prejudice the non-moving party.”
• “In numerous cases, courts have denied tardy discovery motions that were filed after the close of discovery, especially where the moving party had all the information it needed to timely file the discovery motion, and its late filing would prejudice the non-moving party.”
• motion filed 18 months after discovery closed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).