Skip to main content
· 2/15/1983

Olsen v. BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES, W. ELECTRIC CO.

Citations

  • 445 N.E.2d 609
  • 388 Mass. 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing a claim that relates to a single disease from one that involves successive, but distinct, injuries
  • rejecting plaintiff's argument that his claim accrued only when he knew the permanency of his condition
  • dis-tinguishing a claim that relates to a single disease from one that involves successive, but distinct, injuries
  • rejecting plaintiff’s argument that his claim accrued only when he knew the permanency of his condition
  • cause of action accrues on discovery of any injury rather than on discovery that injury is permanent
  • “If knowledge of the extent of injury were to control the accrual of a cause of action, the fixed time period of statutes of limitations effectively would be destroyed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.