Olmstead v. Sisters of Providence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff’s ability to receive overtime pay “suggest[s] that [he] in fact held a role below the level of policymaker”
• addressing the \defendants' contention that they were entitled to fire [the plaintiff] because his accusations of wrongdoing were inherently disruptive.\
• dismissal of employee who blew the whistle on superiors is potential First Amendment violation which may be redressed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
• dismissal of employee who blew the whistle on superiors is potential First Amendment violation which may be redressed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
• contacting OTB Inspector General about alleged improprieties at OTB
• criticism of management's labor policies by union faction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).