Olmstead v. Shakespeare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding rule in Abbott “applies equally” to delivery or receipt of goods where the transportation at issue “is not the primary business of the company”
• declining to adopt a “different standard of review for cases in which the workers’ compensation statute is used as a shield to liability”
• “Abbott represents a change in this state’s jurisprudence on what activity constitutes ‘part of [the owner’s] trade, business, or occupation’ under section 42-1-200, and likely conflicts with cases other than the” two cases explicitly overruled in Abbott

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).