Skip to main content
· 8/19/2016

Olmos Equipment, Inc., Larry Struthoff, S.W.L. Enterprises, Inc., and Tracy Janicke v. Jim Weynand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The rule also requires that if the defendant has any other objections to the prior conviction evidence, he must assert those objections prior to trial.”
  • “The rule also requires that if the defendant has any other objections to the prior conviction evidence, he must assert those objections prior to trial”
  • “The rule also requires that if the defendant has any other objections to the prior conviction evidence, he must assert those objections prior to trial.”
  • “The rule also requires that if the defendant has any other objections to the prior conviction evidence, he must assert those objections prior to trial.”
  • “It is well settled that a district court is given broad discretion to allow a party to reopen the record and introduce evidence that was previously omitted.”
  • “[A] defendant who asserts the habitual offender statute is not applicable must interpose his objections prior to the trial of the underlying charge. If he does not do so, the objections are waived.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.