Ollinger v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence serves to “settle titles”
• explaining that the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence serves to “settle titles”
• hearing case \on appeal as an ordinary action” and reviewing for \assigned errors of law”
• rejecting claim that “actions taken by the Ollingers after the ten-year period required for acquiescence negate[d] or repudiate[d] such acqui- escence in this case”
• rejecting claim that “actions taken by the Ollingers after the ten-year period required for acquiescence negate[d] or repudiate[d] such acquiescence in this case”
• “Determining whether acquiescence has been established requires an inquiry into the factual circumstances of each case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).