Skip to main content
· 9/23/1993

Ollie B. Ross, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of William Ross, Deceased v. City of Waukegan, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 5 F.3d 1084
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1481
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the determination of whether Rule 11 has been violated is necessarily very fact-based and is accordingly reviewed with deference, [but that] the imposition of sanctions, when Rule 11 has been violated, is mandatory”
  • declining to apply the law of the case doctrine because prior 6 judicial statements were “better read as descriptions rather than dispositions of Rebel’s claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Ripple, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.