Olles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding possession alone cannot sufficiently corroborate the testimony of an accomplice when the stolen property was not sufficiently identified at trial
• holding possession alone cannot sufficiently corroborate the testimony of an accomplice when the stolen property was not sufficiently identified at trial
• the mere fact that stolen property was found, after the accused had been incarcerated on another charge for several days, in a house jointly occupied by the accused and one who is an accomplice in its theft is not sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice.
• the mere fact that stolen property was found, after the accused had been incarcerated on another charge for several days, in a house jointly occupied by the accused and one who is an accomplice in its theft is not sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).