Olivero v. Lowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that reversal of verdict rendered in bench trial was not warranted because the error would not have affected the outcome of trial
• noting that a plaintiff must allege extreme and outrageous conduct to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress
• explaining that the physical manifestation requirement is more relaxed for damages claims involving assault
• explaining that the physical manifestation requirement is more relaxed for damages claims involving assault
• noting that causation is an element of intentional infliction of emotional distress
• “[I]n 3 cases where emotional distress damages are not secondary to physical injuries … either a physical 4 impact must have occurred or, in the absence of physical impact, proof of serious emotional distress 5 causing physical injury or illness must be presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).