Olivera v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that section 812.012(10)(b) is not a mere alternative to establishing market or replacement value, but rather may only be applied if “the value of the property cannot be ascertained”
• reversing grand theft of a dwelling conviction and directing entry of a judgment for second-degree pet-it theft when the stolen property consisted of a two-year-old laptop that was purchased for $1400 to $1500 and a less than six-month-old camera and iPod

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• M.K., a child v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-09· cited 3×
• G.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-16· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marrero v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-09-15· cited 39×
• Austin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-08· cited 3×
• Aycock v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-23· cited 3×