Olivera v. Bank of America, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing summary judgment on standing grounds where \[n]othing in the record reflect[ed] a chain of transfer of interest . . . from the original lender\
• reversing a final summary judgment of foreclosure because the original plaintiff lacked standing, despite the substituted plaintiffs possession of a duly endorsed note, which had been filed with the court nearly a year before the substitution
• reversing a final summary judgment of foreclosure because the original plaintiff lacked standing, despite the substituted plaintiff’s possession of a duly endorsed note, which had been filed with the court nearly a year before the substitution
• “Nothing in the record reflects a chain of transfer of interest in the note from the original lender, Ocwen, to BAC, the original plaintiff, or that BAC became the holder of the note before it filed the subject complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).