Oliver v. Townsend

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant sheriffs, as executive officers, were entitled to immunity from claims that they had negligently and wantonly supervised prisoner's health
• stating that “[w]e do not mean to imply that substantive facts can be established simply by an attorney’s signature on a brief. The matters represented here relate only to procedural matters not otherwise reflected in the record ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).