Oliver v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• seeing plastic baggie and believing, based on “training” that “either marijuana or crack cocaine” was inside the baggie, was insufficient
• reversing an order denying a motion to suppress because the incriminating nature of the seized items was not immediately apparent before the officers entered the backyard without a warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bethel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-05· cited 6×
• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-20· cited 5×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. DERRICK JAMMELL PETTIS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-06· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Horton v. California
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
• Tillman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 91×
• State v. Rickard
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-09-30· cited 38×
• Murphy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-11· cited 24×
• De La Cruz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-10· cited 6×
• Minter-Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-31· cited 5×
• Holloman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-20· cited 4×
• State v. Loomis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-07· cited 3×