District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/9/1990
Oliver v. State
Citations
- 569 So. 2d 1332
- 1990 WL 175065
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that as the appellant had prepared for trial on the information initially provided, he was under no obligation to forego his right to trial in order to accommodate the state's circumvention of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
- filing amended information on eve of trial that named both defendant and codefendant was not permissible means of effecting consolidation after court indicated motion to consolidate would have been untimely
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tingley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-09-14· cited 35×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-10· cited 13×
- Harley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-18· cited 10×
- Tingley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-28· cited 4×
- Phelan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.