Oliver v. Oliver
Citations
- 110 Ill. 119
Syllabus
<p>1. Evidence—to prove a deed a forgery—clear proof required. An allegation in a bill filed to set aside a certain deed as a forgery,—that the grantor executed and acknowledged the deed, and after its execution and delivery the defendant erased the name of the complainant, the grantee therein, and inserted his own name in its place,—is one that the complainant is bound to establish affirmatively by clear and convincing proof.</p> <p>2. In this case it was alleged that the defendant took a deed of land, made to his son, to have the same recorded, and fraudulently erased his son’s name and inserted 'his own as grantee, and then had the same recorded, after which it was lost. The court reviews the evidence, and holds that it fails to sustain the allegation as to the alteration or forgery.</p>
Judges: Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lewis v. BlumenthalIllinois Supreme Court· 1947-01-22· cited 13×
- Little v. LittleColorado Court of Appeals· 1913-01-15· cited 5×
- Oliver v. OliverIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-01-25· cited 3×
- Riggs v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1892-04-11
- Roberts v. WoodsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1899-05-19
- Lyon v. OliverAppellate Court of Illinois· 1923-01-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.