Skip to main content
· 8/15/1991

Oliver v. Haas

Citations

  • 777 F. Supp. 1040
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16969
  • 1991 WL 242975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If Congress had intended to allow the use of defendant’s counterclaim in satisfying the jurisdictional amount, it would have explicitly stated so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gierbolini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.