Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Oliver v. California

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1336
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 344
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3493
  • 571 U.S. 1222
  • 2014 WL 684428
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s construction of motion filed after judgment of dismissal without trial as Rule 59(e) motion
  • construing motion based on timing when movant failed to identify rule
  • Rule 59(e) governs motions to reconsider filed within 28 days of entry of judgment
  • Rule 59(e) governs motions to reconsider filed within 28 days of entry of judgment
  • “Rule 59(e) governs motions to reconsider filed within 28 days of a judgment[.]”
  • “Under Rule 41(a)(2), the court had discretion to dismiss the case either with or without prejudice. The court determined that a dismissal with prejudice was proper, and it was within its discretion to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.