· 2/24/2014
Oliver v. California
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 1336
- 188 L. Ed. 2d 344
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3493
- 571 U.S. 1222
- 2014 WL 684428
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1046
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s construction of motion filed after judgment of dismissal without trial as Rule 59(e) motion
- construing motion based on timing when movant failed to identify rule
- Rule 59(e) governs motions to reconsider filed within 28 days of entry of judgment
- Rule 59(e) governs motions to reconsider filed within 28 days of entry of judgment
- “Rule 59(e) governs motions to reconsider filed within 28 days of a judgment[.]”
- “Under Rule 41(a)(2), the court had discretion to dismiss the case either with or without prejudice. The court determined that a dismissal with prejudice was proper, and it was within its discretion to do so.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.