Oliver BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Supreme Court has created some confusion as to when a court is ‘retaining jurisdiction.’”
• “In cases where the [Commissioner] issues a final decision that is partially favorable to the claimant, the claimant may seek judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)”
• “If the individual 20 has fully prevailed on his or her [social security] claim, he or she has no standing to appeal 21 because he or she has received all the relief sought, leaving no case or controversy.”
• “In cases where, as here, the Secretary issues a decision that is fully favorable to the claimant, the claimant cannot seek judicial review”; “he or she has no standing to appeal because he or she has received all the relief sought, leaving no case or controversy”
• observing EAJA time limit is jurisdictional
• observing EAJA time limit is jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).