Skip to main content
· 5/26/1992

Oliver Broussard v. Conoco, Inc., Third Party v. Shrm Catering, Inc., Plaintiff-Third Party

Citations

  • 959 F.2d 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a contract for a caterer to feed the production workers and maintain their living quarters pertained to a well and finding a “‘functional nexus’ arises from the fact that production employees are unquestionably necessary for production from a well”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Jolly, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.