Skip to main content
· 3/21/2007

Oliveira-Brooks v. Re/Max International, Inc.

Citations

  • 865 N.E.2d 252
  • 372 Ill. App. 3d 127
  • 309 Ill. Dec. 889
  • 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating the elements of apparent agency are that the principal held the agent out, the third person reasonably concluded that an agency relationship existed, and the third person relied on the agent’s apparent authority to his detriment
  • mere protection of a trade name does not create an agency relationship
  • “inherent in any franchise is the need to protect the name, goodwill, [and] reputation.”
  • mere protection of a trade name does not create an agency relationship
  • evidence of naming the defendant as an additional insured could not, “as a matter of law, create a genuine issue of material fact to establish an actual agency relationship without some indicia of the right to control the day-to-day real estate business operations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.