Olivares v. University of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the defendant was not in custody by noting among other A-1355-21 14 factors his ability to leave after each day of interrogation by investigators and return to his motel room
• vacating restitution award and remanding for reconsideration in absence of any assessment of defendant's ability to pay
• remanding for A-3309-21 23 restitution hearing where the trial record contained no mention of the defendant's likely future earnings
• distinguishing Orji and requiring ability-to-pay hearing on $271,000 restitution award due to silence of record on defendant's financial resources and likely future earnings
• finding plain error and remanding when a court ordered a defendant to pay restitution without first conducting an ability-to-pay hearing because neither the sentencing transcript nor the presentence report gave any indication as to the defendant's ability to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).